What is the famous Supreme Court case Massachusetts v EPA about?
Environmental Protection Agency is a 2007 United States Supreme Court ruling that found that carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act and can be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
What was at issue in the Michigan v EPA case?
Environmental Protection Agency, 576 U.S. 743 (2015), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court analyzed whether the Environmental Protection Agency must consider costs when deciding to regulate, rather than later in the process of issuing the regulation.
What is the name of that 2015 case?
| Obergefell v. Hodges | |
|---|---|
| Citations | 576 U.S. 644 (more) 135 S. Ct. 2584; 192 L. Ed. 2d 609; 83 U.S.L.W. 4592; 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 472; 2015 WL 2473451; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4250; 2015 BL 204553 |
| Related cases | Bourke v. Beshear, DeBoer v. Snyder, United States v. Windsor, Tanco v. Haslam, Love v. Beshear. |
| Argument | Oral argument |
Who has violated the Clean Air Act?
The Department of Justice, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the State of California announced today a settlement with Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US, and affiliates (Fiat Chrysler or FCA) for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act and California law.
Why did Massachusetts sue the EPA?
Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007), is a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court case in which twelve states and several cities of the United States, represented by James Milkey, brought suit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to force that federal agency to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse …
Why was standing such an important issue in the Massachusetts v EPA case?
The opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens held that Massachusetts, due to its “stake in protecting its quasi-sovereign interests” as a state, had standing to sue the EPA over potential damage caused to its territory by global warming.
Who won Michigan v EPA?
5–4 decision for Michigan Yes. Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion of the 5-4 majority. The Court held that federal administrative agencies must engage in “reasoned decisionmaking,” which requires the agency to consider all relevant factors.
What was the court’s decision in the corrosion fittings case?
In 1991, EPA’s final rule that prohibited the manufacture, importation, processing, and distribution of asbestos in almost all products was overturned by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA, 947 F.
How many Supreme Court Justices are there?
Nine Justices
Nine Justices make up the current Supreme Court: one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr., is the 17th Chief Justice of the United States, and there have been 103 Associate Justices in the Court’s history.
Who has the EPA fined?
SAN FRANCISCO — Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a settlement with Taylor Farms over alleged Clean Air Act violations at the Taylor Fresh, Inc. and Taylor Farms California, Inc. food storage and distribution facilities in Salinas, California.
Does Toyota have a lawsuit?
The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that the United States has filed and simultaneously settled a civil lawsuit against Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North …
