What were the impacts of the Somerset floods 2014?

During December 2013 and January 2014 heavy rainfall led to extensive flooding with over 600 houses and 17,000 acres (6,900 ha) of agricultural land, including North Moor, Curry and Hay Moors and Greylake, affected. The villages of Thorney and Muchelney were cut off with many houses flooded.

What were the main causes of flooding in Somerset 2014?

High tides and storm surges swept water up the rivers from the Bristol Channel exacerbating the problem by preventing freshwater being discharged to sea. The water backed up and overtopped the river banks. For some 20 years, the rivers had not been extensively dredged so they were operating at a much reduced capacity.

What were the causes of the Somerset Levels?

Causes

  • LOTS OF RAINFALL – low pressure from the Atlantic meant 350mm of rain fell in Jan and Feb (100mm above average)
  • HIGH TIDES AND STORM SURGES – swept water up Bristol Channel meaning it burst its banks.
  • LACK OF DREDGING – hadn’t been done for at least 20 years, clogged with sediment.
  • LOW LYING LAND.

How much did the 2014 Somerset floods cost?

Floods cost Somerset up to £147.5 million, report reveals – Somerset Rivers Authority.

What were the main impacts of the flooding of the Somerset Levels?

The Somerset floods cost the county’s tourism industry an estimated £200 million. Soil was damaged after being underwater for nearly three months. In some areas, it took over two years to restore the soil before crops could be grown. Insurance costs increased in flood-hit areas of Somerset.

What are economic impacts of floods?

Loss of livelihoods, reduction in purchasing power and loss of land value in the floodplains can leave communities economically vulnerable. Floods can also traumatise victims and their families for long periods of time. The loss of loved ones has deep impacts, especially on children.

What were the impacts of the Somerset Levels flood?

What were the economic impacts of the Somerset floods 2014?

A first glimpse of the economic impact of the 2014 flooding on Somerset businesses has been revealed following a snapshot survey of businesses in the county, with an average of £17,352 per business being lost in financial terms and productivity in just six weeks.

What were the impacts of the Somerset floods?

What were the impacts of flooding in the Somerset Levels? Over 600 homes and 6880 hectares of agricultural land were flooded. A number of villages were cut off after roads were flooded.

What is the economic effects of Somerset floods 2014?

What were the social effects of the Somerset floods?

Residents transported by boat. Power supplies​were cut off in areas. People’s livelihoods and lifestyles were ​severely disrupted​by the floods, e.g. shopping, going to work, going to school. Some villages, such as Moorland and Muchelney were ​completely cut off and left people stranded.

When did the Somerset Levels flood in 2014?

In January 2014 the Somerset Levels experienced floods greater than any other in living memory. Estimates suggest that 10% of the area was underwater when the flooding was greatest. What were the physical causes of flooding in the Somerset Levels?

Where are the rivers in the Somerset Levels?

All rivers in this area including, Axe, Sheppey and Brue in the north, while to the south, the rivers are the Cary, Yeo, Tone and Parrett drain into the Bristol Channel. In January 2014 the Somerset Levels experienced floods greater than any other in living memory.

How long did it take to restore soil after Somerset flood?

Soil was damaged after being underwater for nearly three months. In some areas, it took over two years to restore the soil before crops could be grown. Insurance costs increased in flood-hit areas of Somerset.

Where was the flooding in England in 2014?

Flood data from the Environment Agency from 7thJanuary to 16thMarch 2014 indicates that the flooding affected a various parts of the south of England and for the purpose this analysis, a number of discrete flood areas have been identified, as detailed in Figure 2.